Scinovex
article Open Access

Clinical and functional outcomes after posterior decompression for prolapsed intervertebral disc at lumbosacral spine: A Prospective study

International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · 2020 · Vol. 6(1) · pp. 440–442
Abhay ChallaniKadam RahulShah AkshayPandey SachinSawant Manasi

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar decompression surgery is one of the most commonly performed spine surgery with numerous variations in the techniques till date. Aim: the aim of the present study was to assess the clinical and functional outcome in patients with lumbosacral disc prolapse after decompression surgery. Materials and Method: A prospective study was conducted on 25 patients with single level lumbar disc prolapse between June 2016 and June 2017. The inclusion criteria were intervertebral disc prolapse at L3-L4/L4-L5 or L5-S1 level with symptoms of radiculopathy for more than 6 weeks who failed conservative line of management. Patients with marked instability, history of previous spine surgery, multiple level involvement and patients with infection were excluded from the study. Results:The mean age of the patients was 44.56+/- 4.34 years. The mean duration of symptoms was 30.24+/-6.20 weeks. The average duration of surgery was 89.32+/-21/15 mins. 52% of the patients had L4-L5 level involvement. The average duration of stay in the hospital was 4.72+/-2.08 days. The pre-operative Visual analog scale score was 6.24+/- 2.34 which decreased to 1.72+/- 0.65 at 24 months. The Mean Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire score was 63.83 pre-operatively which decreased significantly to 19.18 at the end of 12 and 24 months (P< 0.001). Conclusion: Lumbar decompression surgery by standard posterior approach gives a good functional outcome in patients with lumbar disc prolapse and symptoms of radiculopathy without instability.

Spine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyMedical Imaging and AnalysisSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesMedicineOswestry Disability IndexDecompressionSurgeryLumbosacral jointVisual analogue scaleProspective cohort studyIntervertebral discInclusion and exclusion criteriaLumbar
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
7
Percentile
2%
vs. same field & year
References
The Oswestry Disability Index
Spine · 2000 · 5,569 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.