Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit

New Phytologist · 2020 · Vol. 226(6) · pp. 1550–1566
Charlotte GrossiordThomas N. BuckleyLucas A. CernusakKimberly A. NovickBenjamin PoulterRolf SiegwolfJohn S. SperryNate G. McDowell

Abstract

Recent decades have been characterized by increasing temperatures worldwide, resulting in an exponential climb in vapor pressure deficit (VPD). VPD has been identified as an increasingly important driver of plant functioning in terrestrial biomes and has been established as a major contributor in recent drought-induced plant mortality independent of other drivers associated with climate change. Despite this, few studies have isolated the physiological response of plant functioning to high VPD, thus limiting our understanding and ability to predict future impacts on terrestrial ecosystems. An abundance of evidence suggests that stomatal conductance declines under high VPD and transpiration increases in most species up until a given VPD threshold, leading to a cascade of subsequent impacts including reduced photosynthesis and growth, and higher risks of carbon starvation and hydraulic failure. Incorporation of photosynthetic and hydraulic traits in 'next-generation' land-surface models has the greatest potential for improved prediction of VPD responses at the plant- and global-scale, and will yield more mechanistic simulations of plant responses to a changing climate. By providing a fully integrated framework and evaluation of the impacts of high VPD on plant function, improvements in forecasting and long-term projections of climate impacts can be made.

Plant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsClimate variability and modelsPlant responses to elevated CO2Vapour Pressure DeficitBiomeTranspirationEnvironmental scienceStomatal conductanceEcosystemPhotosynthesisAtmospheric sciencesClimate changeEcology

MeSH terms

WaterEcosystemPlant LeavesPlant TranspirationPlant StomataVapor Pressure

Funding

  • Center for Hierarchical Manufacturing, National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Citations
1,944
FWCI
92.14
field-weighted impact
References
186
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.