Scinovex
article Open Access

International journal of applied dental sciences An in vitro comparative study of mechanical properties between bulk-fill composite and conventional composite

International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences · 2020 · Vol. 6(1) · pp. 90–93

Abstract

Abstract: compare compressive strength and hardness between bulk-fill composite and conventional composite. Materials and Methods: The research sample consisted of 60 molds of composite resin (30 samples of conventional composite - 30 samples of bulk-fill composite). The sample of each material was divided into two groups (15 samples for the hardness test and 15 samples for the compressive test). Properties: The results showed that the compressive strength of the conventional resin is more than the compressive strength of the bulk composite resin. There are no statistically significant differences between hardness of conventional composite resin and bulk composite.

Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesScientific and Engineering Research TopicsDental materials and restorationsComposite numberCompressive strengthMaterials scienceComposite materialDental compositeVickers hardness testMicrostructure
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
1%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.