Scinovex
article Open Access

Palatability assessment of treated feed with certain ingredients in crossbred dairy cattle under sub-tropical conditions

International Journal of Chemical Studies · 2020 · Vol. 8(1) · pp. 1776–1780
Dhawal Kant YadavPanch Kishor BhartiAmit Kumar SinghManmohan Singh RajpootGyanendra Kumar GaurPutan Singh

Abstract

A total of 24 crossbred animals (8-12 months of age) were selected and randomly allocated to four different groups(6 animals per group) viz. Group-1 (Gr-1): 100% treated leftover feed; Group-2(Gr-2): 75% treated feed; Group-3 (Gr-3): 50% treated feed and Group-4(Gr-4) or Control: 100% green fodder. The leftover feed F-1, F-2, F-3, F-4, F-5 and F-6 were treated with combination of 1% urea+5% molasses+0.5% salt, 1% urea+5% molasses+1% salt, 1% urea+10% molasses+0.5% salt, 1% urea+10% molasses+1% salt, 5% molasses+0.5% salt and 10% molasses+0.5% salt, respectively. The average palatability score of animals for F-1 feed in Gr-1, Gr-2, Gr-3 and Control was 3.43, 1.56, 1.53 and 1.00, respectively. The average palatability score of animals for F-2 feed in Gr-1, Gr-2, Gr-3 and Control were 2.79, 1.52, 1.50 and 1.00, respectively. The average palatability score of animals for F-3 feed in Gr-1, Gr-2, Gr-3 and Control were 2.66, 1.43, 1.40 and 1.00, respectively. The average palatability score of animals for F-4 feed in Gr-1, Gr-2, Gr-3 and Control were 3.06, 2.36, 2.06 and 1.00, respectively. The average palatability score of animals for F-5 feed in Gr-1, Gr-2, Gr-3 and Control were 3.10, 1.70, 1.66 and 1.00, respectively. The average palatability score of animals for F-5 feed in Gr-1, Gr-2, Gr-3 and Control were 3.10, 1.70, 1.66 and 1.00, respectively. The average palatability score of animals for F-6 feed in Gr-1, Gr-2, Gr-3 and Control were 3.10, 1.96, 1.83 and 1.00, respectively. The palatability score was found significantly (P

Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and HealthGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockPalatabilityFodderAnimal scienceUreaCrossbreedBiologyFood scienceChemistryAgronomyBiochemistry

Funding

  • Indian Council of Agricultural Research
  • ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute
Citations
1
FWCI
0.26
field-weighted impact
References
12
Percentile
52%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.