Scinovex
article Open Access

Caesarean delivery by Misgave ladach technique versus conventional technique: A randomized controlled trial

Shivani SinghShivani SinghUrvashi Verma

Abstract

Objective: This study was designed to compare the Misgave Ladach technique versus conventional technique of caesarian deliveries.Method: This was a prospective study conducted on 160 women undergoing a primary LSCS for various indications. Patients were randomly divided in to two groups of 80 each; group A underwent LSCS by Misgave Ladach technique and group B by conventional method. A per–operative and short term post-operative outcome of both groups were compared.Result: Maternal age, parity, gestational age and indication for caesarean deliveries were similar across groups The operating time, incision delivery interval and post-op pain was significantly reduced in group underwent LSCS by Misgave Ladach method in compare to group who underwent LSCS by conventional technique.Conclusion: Misgave Ladach method may provide a faster technique and cost effective method of LSCS.

Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy-related medical researchAnesthesia and Pain ManagementMedicineSurgeryRandomized controlled trialCaesarean deliveryGestational ageCaesarean sectionPregnancy
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
2
Percentile
14%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Caesarean delivery by Misgave ladach technique versus conventional technique: A randomized controlled trial · Scinovex