review Open AccessTop 1% cited
Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective
Science Advances · 2019 · Vol. 5(7) · pp. eaax0903–eaax0903
Gregory N. Bratman✉(University of Washington)Christopher B. Anderson(Stanford University)Marc G. Berman(University of Chicago)B.J. Cochran(Willamette University)S. de Vries(Wageningen University & Research)Jon Flanders(Bat Conservation International)Carl Folke(Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences)Howard Frumkin(University of Washington)James J. Gross(Stanford University)Terry Hartig(Uppsala University)Peter H. Kahn(University of Washington)Ming Kuo(Illinois Department of Natural Resources)Joshua J. Lawler(University of Washington)Phillip S. Levin(The Nature Conservancy)Therese Lindahl(Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences)Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg(Heidelberg University)Richard Mitchell(University of Glasgow)Zhiyun Ouyang(Chinese Academy of Sciences)Jenny Roe(University of Virginia)Lynn Scarlett(The Nature Conservancy)Jeffrey R. Smith(Stanford University)Matilda van den Bosch(University of British Columbia)Benedict W. Wheeler(University of Exeter)Mathew P. White(University of Exeter)Hua Zheng(Chinese Academy of Sciences)Gretchen C. Daily✉(Cardiovascular Institute of the South)
Abstract
A growing body of empirical evidence is revealing the value of nature experience for mental health. With rapid urbanization and declines in human contact with nature globally, crucial decisions must be made about how to preserve and enhance opportunities for nature experience. Here, we first provide points of consensus across the natural, social, and health sciences on the impacts of nature experience on cognitive functioning, emotional well-being, and other dimensions of mental health. We then show how ecosystem service assessments can be expanded to include mental health, and provide a heuristic, conceptual model for doing so.
Urban Green Space and HealthLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban Agriculture and SustainabilityMental healthEcosystem servicesPerspective (graphical)UrbanizationEmpirical evidencePsychologyValue (mathematics)Ecosystem healthCognitionNatural (archaeology)
MeSH terms
Decision MakingHumansMental HealthModels, TheoreticalEcosystemNatureRisk Reduction Behavior
Funding
- Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
Citations
1,768
FWCI
79.09
field-weighted impact
References
254
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Urban nature in a time of crisis: recreational use of green space increases during the COVID-19 outbreak in Oslo, Norway
Environmental Research Letters · 2020 · 737 citations
Spatial dimensions of the influence of urban green-blue spaces on human health: A systematic review
Environmental Research · 2019 · 449 citations
References
Beyond toxicity11The full text of this article is available via AJPM Online at www.elsevier.com/locate/ajpmonline.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine · 2001 · 759 citations
How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway
Frontiers in Psychology · 2015 · 746 citations
The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2012 · 1,211 citations
Exposure to Neighborhood Green Space and Mental Health: Evidence from the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2014 · 874 citations
Inducing physiological stress recovery with sounds of nature in a virtual reality forest — Results from a pilot study
Physiology & Behavior · 2013 · 612 citations
Glossary of terms used in toxicology, 2nd edition (IUPAC Recommendations 2007)
Pure and Applied Chemistry · 2007 · 781 citations
The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature
Psychological Science · 2008 · 2,398 citations
Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators
Social Science & Medicine · 2013 · 965 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
