Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Assimilation of remote sensing into crop growth models: Current status and perspectives

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · 2019 · Vol. 276-277 · pp. 107609–107609
Jianxi HuangJosé Gómez‐DansHai HuangHongyuan MaQingling WuP. LewisShunlin LiangZhongxin ChenJing‐Hao XueYantong WuFeng ZhaoJing WangXianhong Xie

Abstract

Timely monitoring of crop lands is important in order to make agricultural activities more sustainable, as well as ensuring food security. The use of Earth Observation (EO) data allows crop monitoring at a range of spatial scales, but can be hampered by limitations in the data. Crop growth modelling, on the other hand, can be used to simulate the physiological processes that result in crop development. Data assimilation (DA) provides a way of blending the monitoring properties of EO data with the predictive and explanatory abilities of crop growth models. In this paper, we first provide a critique of both the advantages and disadvantages of both EO data and crop growth models. We use this to introduce a solid and robust framework for DA, where different DA methods are shown to be derived from taking different assumptions in solving for the a posteriori probability density function (pdf) using Bayes’ rule. This treatment allows us to provide some recommendation on the choice of DA method for particular applications. We comment on current computational challenges in scaling DA applications to large spatial scales. Future areas of research are sketched, with an emphasis on DA as an enabler for blending different observations, as well as facilitating different approaches to crop growth models. We have illustrated this review with a large number of examples from the literature.

Remote Sensing in AgricultureClimate change impacts on agricultureEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesAssimilation (phonology)Current (fluid)Data assimilationEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingGeographyMeteorologyGeologyOceanography

Funding

  • Sight Research UK
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Citations
480
FWCI
33.88
field-weighted impact
References
233
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.