Scinovex
article Open Access

Potency and acceptability of oral misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol prior to first trimester abortions

Abstract

Present study was done to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of oral misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before termination of first trimester pregnancy. Recently, prostaglandin E1 analogue misoprostol has caught much attention as cervical priming agent. Prostaglandins are used in different doses and different routes considering the different available results. Misoprostol was originally marketed for prevention of peptic ulcers caused by Prostaglandin synthetase inhibitor (NSAIDS) but now it has a widespread role in obstetric practice specially as a cervical priming agent. The aim of present study is to compare oral misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and to assess its acceptability among women.

Reproductive Health and ContraceptionMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMisoprostolMedicineObstetricsAbortionPregnancyProstaglandin analoguePriming (agriculture)ProstaglandinGynecologyInternal medicine
Citations
1
FWCI
0.22
field-weighted impact
References
7
Percentile
62%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Potency and acceptability of oral misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol prior to first trimester abortions · Scinovex