Scinovex
article Open Access

Comparative study of clinical outcome in the management of open vs closed tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary interlocking nailing technique

National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics · 2019 · Vol. 3(1) · pp. 19–21
Mahesh Kumar NbUllas Mahesh

Abstract

Introduction: Incidence of tibial diaphyseal fractures (26 per 100,000 persons per year in an average population) is the highest among long bone fractures. The present study has been taken to review the results of diaphyseal fractures of tibia, both closed & open, treated with IMLIN. Result: Tibial fractures were more commonly seen in males, 30-55 years constituted majority of thr fractures, dominant side was commonly involved. Conclusion: Closed Tibial fractures have better union rates & lesser the complications when compared to open tibial fractures which are treated with intramedullary interlocking technique.

Bone fractures and treatmentsOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationIntramedullary rodMedicineTibiaInterlockingSurgeryDelayed unionClosed FractureIncidence (geometry)NonunionMathematics
Citations
1
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
6
Percentile
1%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Comparative study of clinical outcome in the management of open vs closed tibial shaft fractures with intramedullary interlocking nailing technique · Scinovex