Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). VI. Dust Trapping in Thin-ringed Protoplanetary Disks

The Astrophysical Journal Letters · 2018 · Vol. 869(2) · pp. L46–L46
Cornelis P. DullemondTilman BirnstielJane HuangNicolás T. KurtovicSean M. AndrewsViviana V. GuzmánLaura M. PérezAndrea IsellaZhaohuan ZhuMyriam BenistyDavid J. WilnerXue-Ning BaiJohn M. CarpenterShangjia ZhangLuca Ricci

Abstract

Abstract A large fraction of the protoplanetary disks observed with ALMA display multiple well-defined and nearly perfectly circular rings in the continuum, in many cases with substantial peak-to-valley contrast. The DSHARP campaign shows that several of these rings are very narrow in radial extent. In this Letter we test the hypothesis that these dust rings are caused by dust trapping in radial pressure bumps, and if confirmed, put constraints on the physics of the dust trapping mechanism. We model this process analytically in 1D, assuming axisymmetry. By comparing this model to the data, we find that all rings are consistent with dust trapping. Based on a plausible model of the dust temperature we find that several rings are narrower than the pressure scale height, providing strong evidence for dust trapping. The rings have peak absorption optical depth in the range between 0.2 and 0.5. The dust masses stored in each of these rings is of the order of tens of Earth masses, though much ambiguity remains due to the uncertainty of the dust opacities. The dust rings are dense enough to potentially trigger the streaming instability, but our analysis cannot give proof of this mechanism actually operating. Our results show, however, that the combination of very low and very large grains can be excluded by the data for all the rings studied in this Letter.

Astrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchTrappingProtoplanetary diskRadiation pressureCosmic dustDust lanePlanetOptical depthRange (aeronautics)Absorption (acoustics)
Citations
364
FWCI
23.22
field-weighted impact
References
73
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.