Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Visualization and Interpretation of Convolutional Neural Network Predictions in Detecting Pneumonia in Pediatric Chest Radiographs

Applied Sciences · 2018 · Vol. 8(10) · pp. 1715–1715
Sivaramakrishnan RajaramanSema CandemirIncheol KimGeorge R. ThomaSameer Antani

Abstract

Pneumonia affects 7% of the global population, resulting in 2 million pediatric deaths every year. Chest X-ray (CXR) analysis is routinely performed to diagnose the disease. Computer-aided diagnostic (CADx) tools aim to supplement decision-making. These tools process the handcrafted and/or convolutional neural network (CNN) extracted image features for visual recognition. However, CNNs are perceived as black boxes since their performance lack explanations. This is a serious bottleneck in applications involving medical screening/diagnosis since poorly interpreted model behavior could adversely affect the clinical decision. In this study, we evaluate, visualize, and explain the performance of customized CNNs to detect pneumonia and further differentiate between bacterial and viral types in pediatric CXRs. We present a novel visualization strategy to localize the region of interest (ROI) that is considered relevant for model predictions across all the inputs that belong to an expected class. We statistically validate the models' performance toward the underlying tasks. We observe that the customized VGG16 model achieves 96.2% and 93.6% accuracy in detecting the disease and distinguishing between bacterial and viral pneumonia respectively. The model outperforms the state-of-the-art in all performance metrics and demonstrates reduced bias and improved generalization.

COVID-19 diagnosis using AIAI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingConvolutional neural networkVisualizationComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePneumoniaBottleneckPopulationMachine learningMedicinePattern recognition (psychology)

Funding

  • Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine
Citations
312
FWCI
23.88
field-weighted impact
References
33
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.