Scinovex
article Open Access

Choice of implant in stable intertrochanteric fracture femur: PFNA vs DHS

International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · 2018 · Vol. 4(3.1) · pp. 09–15
Jitendra RathvaVikas V. PatelManish R. PatelSwapnil Nalge

Abstract

Introduction: The best treatment for trochanteric fracture remains controversial Many methods have been recommended. Stable fixation that allows early mobilization is the treatment of choice. In this study, we aimed to compare the results of osteosynthesis using the PFNA and DHS system, in the treatment of stable intertrochanteric fractures including operative and postoperative complications, general complications and final outcome measurements. Method: We randomised 60 patients with low-energy extracapsular pertrochanteric stable femoral fractures (AO category 31-A1.1-31A.2.1)7 to be treated with the dynamic hip screw or the proximal femoral nail A2. All fractures were categorised according to the AO/ASIF classification. Follow-up reviews were undertaken at four weeks, three and six months post-operatively using Harris hip score. Results: From the first to the 6th month, there was a significant improvement in Harris hip score (p

Hip and Femur FracturesHip disorders and treatmentsCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesMedicineDynamic hip screwSurgeryImplantFemurHarris Hip ScoreOsteosynthesisFixation (population genetics)Intertrochanteric fractureDentistry
Citations
2
FWCI
0.24
field-weighted impact
References
39
Percentile
59%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.