review Open AccessTop 1% cited
Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature
Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2018 · Vol. 20(5) · pp. e10235–e10235
Conceição Granja✉(NORCE Research AS)Wouter Janssen(UiT The Arctic University of Norway)Monika Alise Johansen(NORCE Research AS)
Abstract
The reviewed literature suggested that, to increase the likelihood of success of eHealth interventions, future research must ensure a positive impact in the quality of care, with particular attention given to improved diagnosis, clinical management, and patient-centered care. There is a critical need to perform in-depth studies of the workflow(s) that the intervention will support and to perceive the clinical processes involved.
Electronic Health Records SystemsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationeHealthPsychological interventionSystematic reviewCategorizationMedicineHealth careIntervention (counseling)Qualitative researchMEDLINEPsychology
MeSH terms
HumansMedical InformaticsTelemedicine
Citations
635
FWCI
127.89
field-weighted impact
References
250
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study
BMC Health Services Research · 2012 · 467 citations
Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success
BMJ · 2005 · 2,688 citations
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
BMJ · 2009 · 82,871 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
