Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

CLSI Methods Development and Standardization Working Group Best Practices for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests

Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2018 · Vol. 56(4)
Romney M. HumphriesJane E. AmblerStephanie L. MitchellMariana CastanheiraTanis C. DingleJanet A. HindlerLaura KoethKatherine SeiDwight J. HardyBarbara ZimmerSusan M. Butler‐WuJennifer Dien BardBill BrassoRibhi ShawarTanis C. DingleRomney M. HumphriesKatherine SeiLaura Koeth

Abstract

Effective evaluations of antimicrobial susceptibility tests (ASTs) require robust study design. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing has recognized that many published studies reporting the performance of commercial ASTs (cASTs) suffer from major design and/or analysis flaws, rendering the results difficult or impossible to interpret. This minireview outlines the current consensus of the Methods Development and Standardization Working Group of the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing regarding best practices for systematic evaluation of the performance of an AST, including the analysis and presentation of essential data intended for publication.

MeSH terms

HumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsClinical Laboratory Techniques
Citations
719
FWCI
30.37
field-weighted impact
References
16
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

CLSI Methods Development and Standardization Working Group Best Practices for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests · Scinovex