article Open Access
Comparative study between DHS and PFN in intertrochanteric fractures of femur
International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · 2018 · Vol. 4(1d) · pp. 259–262
Amandeep Singh Bakshi✉(Government Medical College)Pardeep Kumar(Government Medical College)B.S. Brar(Government Medical College)
Abstract
A total 40 patients with fresh intertrochanteric fracture femur (within 15 days) were included in this study. 20 underwent DHS and 20 underwent PFN procedure. After evaluation at 10, 14, 18 weeks for radiological union and at 6 months for Harris Hip score, we found PFN and DHS to be equal in peri-operative and post-operative complications, long term union. But PFN is better in terms of less blood loss, early mobilization, duration of surgery.
Hip and Femur FracturesCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyMedicineFemurSurgeryRadiological weaponBlood lossDynamic hip screwIntertrochanteric fracture
Citations
8
FWCI
0.24
field-weighted impact
References
6
Percentile
56%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Pre fixation compression screw as a cutting-edge technique for varus correction during proximal femoral nailing for intertrochanteric fractures: A study on 46 cases
International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · 2021 · 1 citations
Comparative study on evaluation of results of DHS versus PFN in management of intertrochanteric fractures femur
International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · 2024 · 2 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
