Scinovex
article Open Access

Field evaluation of EC formulations of Metarhizium anisopliae (Meschinikoff) Sorokin and insecticides against groundnut white grub, Holotrichia fissa Brenske

Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies · 2018 · Vol. 6(1) · pp. 1357–1360

Abstract

A field experiment against groundnut white grubs, Holotrichia fissa was laid out in the Hattarawata village of chikkodi taluka, Belgavi district, Karnataka, India during 2013-2014 cropping season. At 30 DAT chlorpyriphos 20 EC @10 l/ha, rynaxypyr 4G @ 20kg/ha, M. anisopliae (Novozyme) @5×109 (3ml/l) and M. anisopliae (Novozyme) @5×109 (2.5 ml/l) cent per cent reduction whereas, M. anisopliae (T-stanes) @1×109 (3ml/l) and M. anisopliae (T-stanes) @1×109 (2.5ml/l) could also produce similar effects among themselves and registered 98.10 and 96.32 % reduction respectively. But, they were significantly superior over M. anisopliae (T-stanes) @1×109 (5 kg/acre), M. anisopliae (Novozyme) @5×109 (2ml/l) and untreated check. Among EC formulations, M. anisopliae (Novozyme) @5×109 (3ml/l) and M. anisopliae (T-stanes) @1×109 (3ml/l) recorded 18.00 and 17.88q/ha yield respectively next to chlorpyriphos 20EC @ 10ml/ l and rynaxypyr 4G @20 kg/ha with 19.17 and 19.16 q/ha respectively. The average benefit for every rupee invested was highest (2.15) in chlorpyriphos 20EC @ 10ml/ l followed by M. anisopliae (Novozyme) @1×109 (3ml/l) with the earnings of Rs. 2.11.

Agricultural pest management studiesEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlMetarhizium anisopliaeBiologyToxicologyAnimal scienceHorticultureMathematicsBiological pest control
Citations
1
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
1%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Field evaluation of EC formulations of Metarhizium anisopliae (Meschinikoff) Sorokin and insecticides against groundnut white grub, Holotrichia fissa Brenske · Scinovex