Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education

Psychological Science · 2018 · Vol. 29(4) · pp. 581–593
Gijsbert StoetDavid C. Geary

Abstract

The underrepresentation of girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields is a continual concern for social scientists and policymakers. Using an international database on adolescent achievement in science, mathematics, and reading ( N = 472,242), we showed that girls performed similarly to or better than boys in science in two of every three countries, and in nearly all countries, more girls appeared capable of college-level STEM study than had enrolled. Paradoxically, the sex differences in the magnitude of relative academic strengths and pursuit of STEM degrees rose with increases in national gender equality. The gap between boys' science achievement and girls' reading achievement relative to their mean academic performance was near universal. These sex differences in academic strengths and attitudes toward science correlated with the STEM graduation gap. A mediation analysis suggested that life-quality pressures in less gender-equal countries promote girls' and women's engagement with STEM subjects.

Career Development and DiversityEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityGender gapGraduation (instrument)Women in scienceReading (process)PsychologyGender equalityScience educationAcademic achievementMathematics educationMediation

MeSH terms

Academic PerformanceAdolescentEngineeringFemaleHumansMaleMathematicsMotivationScienceStudentsTechnologyModels, StatisticalSex DistributionInternationalitySexism
Citations
983
FWCI
163.56
field-weighted impact
References
39
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.