Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Wearable sensors: modalities, challenges, and prospects

Lab on a Chip · 2017 · Vol. 18(2) · pp. 217–248
Jason HeikenfeldAndrew J. JajackJohn A. RogersPhilipp GutrufLimei TianTingrui PanRuyi LiMichelle KhineJihye KimJoseph WangJiwan Kim

Abstract

Wearable sensors have recently seen a large increase in both research and commercialization. However, success in wearable sensors has been a mix of both progress and setbacks. Most of commercial progress has been in smart adaptation of existing mechanical, electrical and optical methods of measuring the body. This adaptation has involved innovations in how to miniaturize sensing technologies, how to make them conformal and flexible, and in the development of companion software that increases the value of the measured data. However, chemical sensing modalities have experienced greater challenges in commercial adoption, especially for non-invasive chemical sensors. There have also been significant challenges in making significant fundamental improvements to existing mechanical, electrical, and optical sensing modalities, especially in improving their specificity of detection. Many of these challenges can be understood by appreciating the body's surface (skin) as more of an information barrier than as an information source. With a deeper understanding of the fundamental challenges faced for wearable sensors and of the state-of-the-art for wearable sensor technology, the roadmap becomes clearer for creating the next generation of innovations and breakthroughs.

Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsModalitiesWearable computerModality (human–computer interaction)Wearable technologyEngineeringComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionNanotechnologyEmbedded systemMaterials science

MeSH terms

Wearable Electronic DevicesEquipment DesignHumansSkin Physiological PhenomenaLab-On-A-Chip DevicesWireless Technology

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • Northwestern University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Defense Threat Reduction Agency
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • U.S. Air Force
  • University of California, Davis
  • University of California, San Diego
  • Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense
Citations
1,265
FWCI
39.11
field-weighted impact
References
182
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Flexible temperature sensors: A review
Sensors and Actuators A Physical · 2020 · 354 citations
Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring
Nature Biotechnology · 2019 · 3,105 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.