Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Validation of Calibrated Energy Models: Common Errors

Energies · 2017 · Vol. 10(10) · pp. 1587–1587
Germán Ramos RuizCarlos Fernández Bandera

Abstract

Nowadays, there is growing interest in all the smart technologies that provide us with information and knowledge about the human environment. In the energy field, thanks to the amount of data received from smart meters and devices and the progress made in both energy software and computers, the quality of energy models is gradually improving and, hence, also the suitability of Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs). For this reason, the measurement of the accuracy of building energy models is an important task, because once the model is validated through a calibration procedure, it can be used, for example, to apply and study different strategies to reduce its energy consumption in maintaining human comfort. There are several agencies that have developed guidelines and methodologies to establish a measure of the accuracy of these models, and the most widely recognized are: ASHRAE Guideline 14-2014, the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) and the Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP). This article intends to shed light on these validation measurements (uncertainty indices) by focusing on the typical mistakes made, as these errors could produce a false belief that the models used are calibrated.

Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationSustainable Building Design and AssessmentEnergy Efficiency and ManagementASHRAE 90.1Computer scienceProtocol (science)Energy consumptionMeasure (data warehouse)Energy (signal processing)Reliability engineeringCalibrationField (mathematics)Software
Citations
329
FWCI
18.39
field-weighted impact
References
98
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.