Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Melanoma staging: Evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual

CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2017 · Vol. 67(6) · pp. 472–492
Jeffrey E. GershenwaldRichard A. ScolyerKenneth R. HessVernon K. SondakGeorgina V. LongMerrick I. RossAlexander J. LazarMark B. FariesJohn M. KirkwoodGrant A. McArthurLauren E. HayduAlexander M.M. EggermontKeith T. FlahertyCharles M. BalchJohn F. Thompson

Abstract

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE To update the melanoma staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) a large database was assembled comprising >46,000 patients from 10 centers worldwide with stages I, II, and III melanoma diagnosed since 1998. Based on analyses of this new database, the existing seventh edition AJCC stage IV database, and contemporary clinical trial data, the AJCC Melanoma Expert Panel introduced several important changes to the Tumor, Nodes, Metastasis (TNM) classification and stage grouping criteria. Key changes in the eighth edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual include: 1) tumor thickness measurements to be recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm, not 0.01 mm; 2) definitions of T1a and T1b are revised (T1a, <0.8 mm without ulceration; T1b, 0.8-1.0 mm with or without ulceration or <0.8 mm with ulceration), with mitotic rate no longer a T category criterion; 3) pathological (but not clinical) stage IA is revised to include T1b N0 M0 (formerly pathologic stage IB); 4) the N category descriptors "microscopic" and "macroscopic" for regional node metastasis are redefined as "clinically occult" and "clinically apparent"; 5) prognostic stage III groupings are based on N category criteria and T category criteria (ie, primary tumor thickness and ulceration) and increased from 3 to 4 subgroups (stages IIIA-IIID); 6) definitions of N subcategories are revised, with the presence of microsatellites, satellites, or in-transit metastases now categorized as N1c, N2c, or N3c based on the number of tumor-involved regional lymph nodes, if any; 7) descriptors are added to each M1 subcategory designation for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (LDH elevation no longer upstages to M1c); and 8) a new M1d designation is added for central nervous system metastases. This evidence-based revision of the AJCC melanoma staging system will guide patient treatment, provide better prognostic estimates, and refine stratification of patients entering clinical trials. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:472-492. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysCell Image Analysis TechniquesMedicineMelanomaCancer stagingCancerStage (stratigraphy)AJCC staging systemOccultMetastasisPathologicalOncology

MeSH terms

HumansLymphatic MetastasisMelanomaNeoplasm StagingRegistriesSkin NeoplasmsSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesPractice Guidelines as Topic

Funding

  • Melanoma Research Alliance
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Emory University
  • Washington University in St. Louis
  • Dartmouth College
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • University of Sydney
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Istituto Oncologico Veneto
  • Melanoma Institute Australia
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Audrey and Theodor Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
  • Winship Cancer Institute
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Cancer Institute
Citations
2,248
FWCI
96.90
field-weighted impact
References
101
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Melanoma staging: Evidence‐based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual · Scinovex