Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Allergy · 2017 · Vol. 73(4) · pp. 765–798
Graham RobertsOliver PfaarCezmi A. AkdişIgnacio J. AnsoteguiStephen R. DurhamRoy Gerth van WijkSusanne HalkenDésirée Larenas‐LinnemannRuby PawankarConstantinos PitsiosAziz SheikhMargitta WormStefania ArasiMoisés A. CalderónCemal CingiSangeeta DhamiJ.-L. FauquertEckard HamelmannPeter W. HellingsLars JacobsenEdward F. KnolShyh‐Jye LinParaskevi MagginaRalph MösgesJ. N. G. Oude ElberinkG. B. PajnoElide A. PastorelloMartín PenagosGuiseppina RotirotiCarsten B. Schmidt‐WeberFrans TimmermansOlympia TsilochristouE.‐M. VargaJ. N. WilkinsonAndrew B. WilliamsLuo ZhangIoana AgacheElizabeth AngierMontserrat Fernández‐RivasMarek JutelSusanne LauRonald van ReeDermot RyanGunter J. SturmAntonella Muraro

Abstract

Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR) is an allergic disorder of the nose and eyes affecting about a fifth of the general population. Symptoms of AR can be controlled with allergen avoidance measures and pharmacotherapy. However, many patients continue to have ongoing symptoms and an impaired quality of life; pharmacotherapy may also induce some side-effects. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) represents the only currently available treatment that targets the underlying pathophysiology, and it may have a disease-modifying effect. Either the subcutaneous (SCIT) or sublingual (SLIT) routes may be used. This Guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Taskforce on AIT for AR and is part of the EAACI presidential project "EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy." It aims to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations and has been informed by a formal systematic review and meta-analysis. Its generation has followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) approach. The process included involvement of the full range of stakeholders. In general, broad evidence for the clinical efficacy of AIT for AR exists but a product-specific evaluation of evidence is recommended. In general, SCIT and SLIT are recommended for both seasonal and perennial AR for its short-term benefit. The strongest evidence for long-term benefit is documented for grass AIT (especially for the grass tablets) where long-term benefit is seen. To achieve long-term efficacy, it is recommended that a minimum of 3 years of therapy is used. Many gaps in the evidence base exist, particularly around long-term benefit and use in children.

Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationOcular Surface and Contact LensAsthma and respiratory diseasesMedicineAllergen immunotherapyImmunologyAllergenAllergyImmunotherapyDermatologyImmune system

MeSH terms

Conjunctivitis, AllergicDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansRhinitis, Allergic

Funding

  • European Commission
  • European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Citations
750
FWCI
37.67
field-weighted impact
References
223
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
EAACI guidelines: Anaphylaxis (2021 update)
Allergy · 2021 · 529 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy: Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis · Scinovex