Scinovex
article Open Access

Comparative study of static versus dynamic intramedullary nailing of tibia

International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · 2017 · Vol. 3(3e) · pp. 283–286
Ashish SomaniMahammad Akram A SajiYash B RabariRanjan GuptaAjinkya Bhaskarrao JadhaoNawaz Sharif

Abstract

Materials & Methods: This was a retrospective case–control study of closed or type I open tibial diaphyseal fractures (types A and B according to the AO classification) treated with dynamic nailing (30 cases) or static nailing (30 cases). The type of intramedullary nail, the surgical technique and the postoperative protocol were similar for both groups, with the exception of the locking mode and the time of weight bearing. Time to union, mechanical and biological complications, and the number and type of re-operations needed until union were recorded and analysed. Conclusions: Dynamic nailing assembly in intramedullary nailing in closed or type I open tibial diaphyseal fractures with limited comminution (types A and B according to the AO classification) is safe when used for these fracture types.

Bone fractures and treatmentsOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationMusculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationIntramedullary rodMedicineSurgeryTibiaTibia FractureWeight-bearingDelayed unionNonunion
Citations
10
FWCI
0.35
field-weighted impact
References
11
Percentile
64%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.