Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy

The ISME Journal · 2017 · Vol. 11(11) · pp. 2399–2406
Konstantinos T. KonstantinidisRamon Rosselló‐MóraRudolf Amann

Abstract

The great majority of microbial species remains uncultured, severely limiting their taxonomic characterization and thus communication among scientists. Although Candidatus was devised as a provisional category to classify uncultured taxa, it has not been widely accepted owing to technical limitations and lack of priority of Candidatus names in the official nomenclature. High-throughput sequencing provides the potential for data-rich taxonomic descriptions of uncultivated microbes, comparable in quality to those of cultured organisms. In order to fully realize this potential, standards and guidelines on how to perform these descriptions are needed. Here we aimed to outline these standards and draw the roadmap for a new genome-based taxonomy that, at least initially, would be parallel but highly convergent to the one in existence for isolates. In particular, we recommend the use of DNA genome sequences, recovered by population binning or single-cell techniques, as the basis for (i) identification and phylogenetic placement, (ii) bioinformatics-based functional and thus phenotypic predictions, as well as (iii) type material. We also recommend the implementation of an independent nomenclatural system for uncultivated taxa, following the same nomenclature rules as those for cultured Bacteria and Archaea but with its own list of validly published names. If widely adopted, this system will not only facilitate a comprehensive characterization of the 'uncultivated majority', but also provide a unified catalogue of validly published names, thereby avoiding synonyms and confusion. We also suggest that a committee of experts, supported by an international microbiological society, should be formed to govern the new classification system.

Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyOral microbiology and periodontitis researchBiologyNomenclatureTaxonTaxonomy (biology)ConfusionCandidatusBacterial taxonomyEvolutionary biologyIdentification (biology)Phylogenetic nomenclature

MeSH terms

ArchaeaBacteriaPhylogenyComputational Biology

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • European Regional Development Fund
Citations
769
FWCI
19.93
field-weighted impact
References
45
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2009 · 6,211 citations
DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · 2007 · 4,757 citations
Towards a Genome-Based Taxonomy for Prokaryotes
Journal of Bacteriology · 2005 · 1,157 citations
Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · 1994 · 6,996 citations
Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · 2002 · 1,519 citations
International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · 2015 · 720 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy · Scinovex