Scinovex
article Open Access

Co-relation between clinical, MRI and arthroscopic findings in meniscal injuries

International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences · 2017 · Vol. 3(2j) · pp. 872–875
Ashish SomaniMahammad Akram A SajiYash B RabariNikhil M IngaleAbhishek SinghParminder Singh

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study is to correlate clinical, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and arthroscopic findings in cases of meniscal tear injuries. MRI scan results and clinical diagnosis are compared against the arthroscopic confirmation of the diagnosis. Thirty patients had suspected traumatic meniscal injury. Clinical examination had better sensitivity (77.77% vs. 69.23%), predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy (87.85% vs. 87.54%) in comparison to MRI scan in diagnosis for medial meniscal tears. These parameters showed only marginal difference in lateral meniscal injuries. We conclude that carefully performed clinical examination can give equal or better diagnosis of meniscal injuries in comparison to MRI scan. MRI may be used to rule out such injuries rather than to diagnose them.

Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesSports injuries and preventionOrthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyArthroscopyPhysical examinationClinical diagnosisTearsProspective cohort studySurgery
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
13
Percentile
13%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.