review Open AccessTop 1% cited
Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis
BMJ Open · 2017 · Vol. 7(2) · pp. e011146–e011146
Linda Lang(University of Wolverhampton)Angela Clifford(University of Wolverhampton)Li Wei(University College London)Dongmei Zhang(Anhui Medical University)Daryl Leung(New Cross Hospital)Glenda Augustine(City of Wolverhampton College)Isaac M. Danat(University of Wolverhampton)Weiju Zhou(University of Wolverhampton)J. R. M. Copeland(University of Liverpool)Kaarin J. Anstey(Australian National University)Ruoling Chen✉(University of Wolverhampton)
Abstract
The prevalence of undetected dementia is high globally. Wide variations in detecting dementia need to be urgently examined, particularly in populations with low socioeconomic status. Efforts are required to reduce diagnostic inequality and to improve early diagnosis in the community.
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMedicineMeta-analysisDementiaSystematic reviewEpidemiologyMEDLINEGerontologyFamily medicinePathologyDisease
MeSH terms
Age FactorsAsiaDementiaEuropeHumansNorth AmericaResidential FacilitiesSex FactorsPrevalenceIndependent Living
Funding
- Bupa Foundation
- Dementia Collaborative Research Centres, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council
Citations
635
FWCI
29.47
field-weighted impact
References
45
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Underdiagnosis of Dementia: an Observational Study of Patterns in Diagnosis and Awareness in US Older Adults
Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2018 · 478 citations
References
The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses
Medical Entomology and Zoology · 2014 · 17,868 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.