Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

A Survey on Activity Detection and Classification Using Wearable Sensors

IEEE Sensors Journal · 2016 · Vol. 17(2) · pp. 386–403
Maria CornacchiaKoray ÖzcanYu ZhengSenem Velipasalar

Abstract

Activity detection and classification are very important for autonomous monitoring of humans for applications, including assistive living, rehabilitation, and surveillance. Wearable sensors have found wide-spread use in recent years due to their ever-decreasing cost, ease of deployment and use, and ability to provide continuous monitoring as opposed to sensors installed at fixed locations. Since many smart phones are now equipped with a variety of sensors, such as accelerometer, gyroscope, and camera, it has become more feasible to develop activity monitoring algorithms employing one or more of these sensors with increased accessibility. We provide a complete and comprehensive survey on activity classification with wearable sensors, covering a variety of sensing modalities, including accelerometer, gyroscope, pressure sensors, and camera- and depth-based systems. We discuss differences in activity types tackled by this breadth of sensing modalities. For example, accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer systems have a history of addressing whole body motion or global type activities, whereas camera systems provide the context necessary to classify local interactions, or interactions of individuals with objects. We also found that these single sensing modalities laid the foundation for hybrid works that tackle a mix of global and local interaction-type activities. In addition to the type of sensors and type of activities classified, we provide details on each wearable system that include on-body sensor location, employed learning approach, and extent of experimental setup. We further discuss where the processing is performed, i.e., local versus remote processing, for different systems. This is one of the first surveys to provide such breadth of coverage across different wearable sensor systems for activity classification.

Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTactile and Sensory InteractionsIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingAccelerometerGyroscopeWearable computerModalitiesComputer scienceWearable technologyContext (archaeology)Software deploymentActivity recognitionReal-time computing

Funding

  • Division of Computer and Network Systems
Citations
423
FWCI
19.32
field-weighted impact
References
245
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Wearable Sensors for Human Activity Monitoring: A Review
IEEE Sensors Journal · 2014 · 1,354 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.