Scinovex
reviewTop 1% cited

Painful Temporomandibular Disorder

Journal of Dental Research · 2016 · Vol. 95(10) · pp. 1084–1092
Gary D. SladeRichard OhrbachJoel D. GreenspanRoger B. FillingimEric BairAnne E. SandersRonald DubnerLuda DiatchenkoCarolina B. MelotoShad B. SmithWilliam Maixner

Abstract

In 2006, the OPPERA project (Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment) set out to identify risk factors for development of painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD). A decade later, this review summarizes its key findings. At 4 US study sites, OPPERA recruited and examined 3,258 community-based TMD-free adults assessing genetic and phenotypic measures of biological, psychosocial, clinical, and health status characteristics. During follow-up, 4% of participants per annum developed clinically verified TMD, although that was a "symptom iceberg" when compared with the 19% annual rate of facial pain symptoms. The most influential predictors of clinical TMD were simple checklists of comorbid health conditions and nonpainful orofacial symptoms. Self-reports of jaw parafunction were markedly stronger predictors than corresponding examiner assessments. The strongest psychosocial predictor was frequency of somatic symptoms, although not somatic reactivity. Pressure pain thresholds measured at cranial sites only weakly predicted incident TMD yet were strongly associated with chronic TMD, cross-sectionally, in OPPERA's separate case-control study. The puzzle was resolved in OPPERA's nested case-control study where repeated measures of pressure pain thresholds revealed fluctuation that coincided with TMD's onset, persistence, and recovery but did not predict its incidence. The nested case-control study likewise furnished novel evidence that deteriorating sleep quality predicted TMD incidence. Three hundred genes were investigated, implicating 6 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as risk factors for chronic TMD, while another 6 SNPs were associated with intermediate phenotypes for TMD. One study identified a serotonergic pathway in which multiple SNPs influenced risk of chronic TMD. Two other studies investigating gene-environment interactions found that effects of stress on pain were modified by variation in the gene encoding catechol O-methyltransferase. Lessons learned from OPPERA have verified some implicated risk factors for TMD and refuted others, redirecting our thinking. Now it is time to apply those lessons to studies investigating treatment and prevention of TMD.

Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsTemporomandibular Joint DisordersBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersOrofacial painMedicinePsychosocialSingle-nucleotide polymorphismIncidence (geometry)Chronic painProspective cohort studyInternal medicinePhysical therapyPsychiatry

MeSH terms

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesFacial PainGenotypeHumansPain MeasurementPhenotypeRisk FactorsTemporomandibular Joint DisordersUnited StatesRisk AssessmentPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGene-Environment Interaction

Funding

  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
Citations
611
FWCI
21.23
field-weighted impact
References
44
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.