Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

2016 Consensus statement on return to sport from the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy, Bern

British Journal of Sports Medicine · 2016 · Vol. 50(14) · pp. 853–864
Clare L. ArdernPhilip GlasgowAnthony G. SchneidersErik WitvrouwBenjamin ClarsenAnn CoolsBoris GojanovicSteffan GriffinKarim M. KhanHåvard MoksnesStephen MutchNicola PhillipsGustaaf ReurinkRobin SadlerKarin Grävare SilbernagelKristian ThorborgArnlaug WangensteenKevin E. WilkMario Bizzini

Abstract

Deciding when to return to sport after injury is complex and multifactorial-an exercise in risk management. Return to sport decisions are made every day by clinicians, athletes and coaches, ideally in a collaborative way. The purpose of this consensus statement was to present and synthesise current evidence to make recommendations for return to sport decision-making, clinical practice and future research directions related to returning athletes to sport. A half day meeting was held in Bern, Switzerland, after the First World Congress in Sports Physical Therapy. 17 expert clinicians participated. 4 main sections were initially agreed upon, then participants elected to join 1 of the 4 groups-each group focused on 1 section of the consensus statement. Participants in each group discussed and summarised the key issues for their section before the 17-member group met again for discussion to reach consensus on the content of the 4 sections. Return to sport is not a decision taken in isolation at the end of the recovery and rehabilitation process. Instead, return to sport should be viewed as a continuum, paralleled with recovery and rehabilitation. Biopsychosocial models may help the clinician make sense of individual factors that may influence the athlete's return to sport, and the Strategic Assessment of Risk and Risk Tolerance framework may help decision-makers synthesise information to make an optimal return to sport decision. Research evidence to support return to sport decisions in clinical practice is scarce. Future research should focus on a standardised approach to defining, measuring and reporting return to sport outcomes, and identifying valuable prognostic factors for returning to sport.

Sports injuries and preventionTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesReturn to sportRehabilitationBiopsychosocial modelAthletesApplied psychologySports medicineMedicinePsychologyPhysical therapyPublic relations

MeSH terms

Clinical Decision-MakingReturn to SportAthletic InjuriesCommunicationCongresses as TopicDecision MakingHumansRisk FactorsSportsSwitzerlandPractice Guidelines as TopicRecovery of FunctionAthletes
Citations
872
FWCI
44.45
field-weighted impact
References
159
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Epidemiology of Muscle Injuries in Professional Football (Soccer)
The American Journal of Sports Medicine · 2011 · 1,427 citations
Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2012 · 4,100 citations
Incidence, Risk, and Prevention of Hamstring Muscle Injuries in Professional Rugby Union
The American Journal of Sports Medicine · 2006 · 646 citations
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Female Athletes
The American Journal of Sports Medicine · 2006 · 1,028 citations
Strength Imbalances and Prevention of Hamstring Injury in Professional Soccer Players
The American Journal of Sports Medicine · 2008 · 945 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.