Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Fuzzy-Set Social Science

Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · 2001 · Vol. 30(4) · pp. 331–331

Abstract

In this innovative approach to the practice of social science, Charles Ragin explores the use of sets to bridge the divide between quantitative and qualitative methods. Paradoxically, the set is a powerful tool because it replaces an unwieldy, fuzzy instrument (the variable, which establishes only the positions of cases relative to each other) with a precise one (degree of membership in a well-defined set). Ragin argues that sets allow a far richer dialogue between ideas and evidence in social research than previously possible. They let quantitative researchers abandon homogenizing assumptions about cases and causes, they extend diversity-oriented research strategies, and they provide a powerful connection between theory and data analysis. Most important, sets can be carefully tailored to fit evolving theoretical concepts, sharpening quantitative tools with in-depth knowledge gained through qualitative, case-oriented inquiry. This book should revolutionize research methods not only in sociology, political science and anthropology but in any field of inquiry dealing with complex patterns of causation.

Socioeconomic Development in MENAQualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchMiddle East and Rwanda ConflictsSociologySet (abstract data type)Fuzzy logicComputer scienceSocial scienceArtificial intelligenceProgramming language
Citations
2,831
FWCI
151.23
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.