Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Urban Air Pollution Monitoring System With Forecasting Models

IEEE Sensors Journal · 2016 · Vol. 16(8) · pp. 2598–2606
Khaled ShabanAbdullah KadriEman Rezk

Abstract

A system for monitoring and forecasting urban air pollution is presented in this paper. The system uses low-cost air-quality monitoring motes that are equipped with an array of gaseous and meteorological sensors. These motes wirelessly communicate to an intelligent sensing platform that consists of several modules. The modules are responsible for receiving and storing the data, preprocessing and converting the data into useful information, forecasting the pollutants based on historical information, and finally presenting the acquired information through different channels, such as mobile application, Web portal, and short message service. The focus of this paper is on the monitoring system and its forecasting module. Three machine learning (ML) algorithms are investigated to build accurate forecasting models for one-step and multi-step ahead of concentrations of ground-level ozone (O <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sub> ), nitrogen dioxide (NO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> ), and sulfur dioxide (SO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> ). These ML algorithms are support vector machines, M5P model trees, and artificial neural networks (ANN). Two types of modeling are pursued: 1) univariate and 2) multivariate. The performance evaluation measures used are prediction trend accuracy and root mean square error (RMSE). The results show that using different features in multivariate modeling with M5P algorithm yields the best forecasting performances. For example, using M5P, RMSE is at its lowest, reaching 31.4, when hydrogen sulfide (H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> S) is used to predict SO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> . Contrarily, the worst performance, i.e., RMSE of 62.4, for SO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> is when using ANN in univariate modeling. The outcome of this paper can be significantly useful for alarming applications in areas with high air pollution levels.

Air Quality Monitoring and ForecastingAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisComputer scienceMean squared errorUnivariateArtificial neural networkMachine learningMultivariate statisticsArtificial intelligencePreprocessorData miningAir quality index
Citations
281
FWCI
13.23
field-weighted impact
References
33
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Neural networks for pattern recognition
Choice Reviews Online · 1994 · 18,690 citations
A Mobile GPRS-Sensors Array for Air Pollution Monitoring
IEEE Sensors Journal · 2010 · 350 citations
Support-vector networks
Machine Learning · 1995 · 39,987 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.