Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Interactions among ecosystem stressors and their importance in conservation

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2016 · Vol. 283(1824) · pp. 20152592–20152592
Isabelle M. CôtéEmily S. DarlingChristopher J. Brown

Abstract

Interactions between multiple ecosystem stressors are expected to jeopardize biological processes, functions and biodiversity. The scientific community has declared stressor interactions-notably synergies-a key issue for conservation and management. Here, we review ecological literature over the past four decades to evaluate trends in the reporting of ecological interactions (synergies, antagonisms and additive effects) and highlight the implications and importance to conservation. Despite increasing popularity, and ever-finer terminologies, we find that synergies are (still) not the most prevalent type of interaction, and that conservation practitioners need to appreciate and manage for all interaction outcomes, including antagonistic and additive effects. However, it will not be possible to identify the effect of every interaction on every organism's physiology and every ecosystem function because the number of stressors, and their potential interactions, are growing rapidly. Predicting the type of interactions may be possible in the near-future, using meta-analyses, conservation-oriented experiments and adaptive monitoring. Pending a general framework for predicting interactions, conservation management should enact interventions that are robust to uncertainty in interaction type and that continue to bolster biological resilience in a stressful world.

Ecosystem dynamics and resilienceSpecies Distribution and Climate ChangeEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesStressorPsychological resiliencePopularityBiodiversityEnvironmental resource managementEcosystemOrganismEcologyAdaptive managementBiodiversity conservation

MeSH terms

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemBiodiversity

Funding

  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Griffith University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Citations
861
FWCI
43.01
field-weighted impact
References
57
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity?
Biological Conservation · 2018 · 700 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.