Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Physical Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors

Sensors · 2015 · Vol. 15(12) · pp. 31314–31338
Ferhat AttalSamer MohammedMariam DedabrishviliFaïcel ChamroukhiLatifa OukhellouYacine Amirat

Abstract

This paper presents a review of different classification techniques used to recognize human activities from wearable inertial sensor data. Three inertial sensor units were used in this study and were worn by healthy subjects at key points of upper/lower body limbs (chest, right thigh and left ankle). Three main steps describe the activity recognition process: sensors' placement, data pre-processing and data classification. Four supervised classification techniques namely, k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), and Random Forest (RF) as well as three unsupervised classification techniques namely, k-Means, Gaussian mixture models (GMM) and Hidden Markov Model (HMM), are compared in terms of correct classification rate, F-measure, recall, precision, and specificity. Raw data and extracted features are used separately as inputs of each classifier. The feature selection is performed using a wrapper approach based on the RF algorithm. Based on our experiments, the results obtained show that the k-NN classifier provides the best performance compared to other supervised classification algorithms, whereas the HMM classifier is the one that gives the best results among unsupervised classification algorithms. This comparison highlights which approach gives better performance in both supervised and unsupervised contexts. It should be noted that the obtained results are limited to the context of this study, which concerns the classification of the main daily living human activities using three wearable accelerometers placed at the chest, right shank and left ankle of the subject.

Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringGait Recognition and AnalysisArtificial intelligenceHidden Markov modelActivity recognitionSupport vector machinePattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceClassifier (UML)Random forestWearable computerMixture model

MeSH terms

AdultAlgorithmsClothingHumansHuman ActivitiesPattern Recognition, AutomatedNormal DistributionMonitoring, AmbulatoryAccelerometry
Citations
778
FWCI
29.21
field-weighted impact
References
102
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the <i>EM</i> Algorithm
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · 1977 · 49,286 citations
PCA versus LDA
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2001 · 3,200 citations
The viterbi algorithm
Proceedings of the IEEE · 1973 · 5,618 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.