Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Resistance to the Cry1Ac δ-Endotoxin of <I>Bacillus thuringiensis</I> in the Cotton Bollworm, <I>Helicoverpa armigera</I> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Journal of Economic Entomology · 2003 · Vol. 96(4) · pp. 1290–1299
Raymond J. AkhurstWilliam JamesLisa J. BirdCheryl E. Beard

Abstract

Three laboratory strains of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) were established by mating of field-collected insects with an existing insecticide-susceptible laboratory strain. These strains were cultured on artificial diet containing the Cry1Ac protoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis using three different protocols. When no response to selection was detected after 7-11 generations of selection, the three strains were combined by controlled mating to preserve genetic diversity. The composite strain (BX) was selected on the basis of growth rate on artificial diet containing Cry1Ac crystals. Resistance to Cry1Ac was first detected after 16 generations of continuous selection. The resistance ratio (RR) peaked approximately 300-fold at generation 21, after which it declined to oscillate between 57- and 111-fold. First-instar H. armigera from generation 25 (RR = 63) were able to complete their larval development on transgenic cotton expressing Cry1Ac and produce fertile adults. There appeared to be a fitness cost associated with resistance on cotton and on artificial diet. The BX strain was not resistant to the commercial Bt spray formulations DiPel and XenTari, which contain multiple insecticidal crystal proteins, but was resistant to the MVP formulation, which only contains Cry1Ac. The strain was also resistant to Cry1Ab but not to Cry2Aa or Cry2Ab. Toxin binding assays showed that the resistant insects lacked the high affinity binding site that was detected in early generations of the strain. Genetic analysis confirmed that resistance in the BX strain of H. armigera is incompletely recessive.

Insect Resistance and GeneticsInsect and Pesticide ResearchEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlCry1AcBacillus thuringiensisHelicoverpa armigeraBiologyNoctuidaeLepidoptera genitaliaStrain (injury)Bt cottonBollwormVeterinary medicine

MeSH terms

Bacillus thuringiensis ToxinsAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsEndotoxinsHemolysin ProteinsInsecticide ResistanceLarvaMothsSelection, Genetic

Funding

  • Cotton Research and Development Corporation
Citations
217
FWCI
4.44
field-weighted impact
References
46
Percentile
95%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Genetically modified (GM) cotton: Its past, present and future: A review
Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies · 2019 · 2 citations
Insect Resistance to Transgenic Bt Crops: Lessons from the Laboratory and Field
Journal of Economic Entomology · 2003 · 507 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Resistance to the Cry1Ac δ-Endotoxin of <I>Bacillus thuringiensis</I> in the Cotton Bollworm, <I>Helicoverpa armigera</I> (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) · Scinovex