Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology

Psychological Science · 1992 · Vol. 3(4) · pp. 251–256
David M. BussRandy J. LarsenDrew WestenJennifer Semmelroth

Abstract

In species with internal female fertilization, males risk both lowered paternity probability and investment in rival gametes if their mates have sexual contact with other males. Females of such species do not risk lowered maternity probability through partner infidelity, but they do risk the diversion of their mates' commitment and resources to rival females. Three studies tested the hypothesis that sex differences in jealousy emerged in humans as solutions to the respective adaptive problems faced by each sex. In Study 1, men and women selected which event would upset them more—a partner's sexual infidelity or emotional infidelity. Study 2 recorded physiological responses (heart rate, electrodermal response, corrugator supercilii contraction) while subjects imagined separately the two types of partner infidelity. Study 3 tested the effect of being in a committed sexual relationship on the activation of jealousy. All studies showed large sex differences, confirming hypothesized sex linkages in jealousy activation.

Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsJealousyPsychologyEvolutionary psychologyDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyClinical psychology
Citations
1,264
FWCI
12.72
field-weighted impact
References
30
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating.
Psychological Review · 1993 · 4,224 citations
References
The evolution of human sexuality
Personality and Individual Differences · 1980 · 2,517 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Sex Differences in Jealousy: Evolution, Physiology, and Psychology · Scinovex