Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis

World Development · 2014 · Vol. 64(Suppl 1) · pp. S12–S28
Arild AngelsenPamela JaggerRonnie BabigumiraB. BelcherNicholas J. HogarthSimone BauchJan BörnerCarsten Smith‐HallSven Wunder

Abstract

This paper presents results from a comparative analysis of environmental income from approximately 8000 households in 24 developing countries collected by research partners in CIFOR's Poverty Environment Network (PEN). Environmental income accounts for 28% of total household income, 77% of which comes from natural forests. Environmental income shares are higher for low-income households, but differences across income quintiles are less pronounced than previously thought. The poor rely more heavily on subsistence products such as wood fuels and wild foods, and on products harvested from natural areas other than forests. In absolute terms environmental income is approximately five times higher in the highest income quintile, compared to the two lowest quintiles.

Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementIncome, Poverty, and InequalityAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentLivelihoodRural developmentGeographyEconomicsDevelopment economicsNatural resource economicsAgriculture

Funding

  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Centre for International Forestry Research
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Danish International Development Agency
Citations
1,067
FWCI
51.02
field-weighted impact
References
95
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.