Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognition

PLoS Computational Biology · 2014 · Vol. 10(12) · pp. e1003963–e1003963
Charles F. CadieuHa HongDaniel YaminsNicolas PintoDiego ArdilaEthan A. SolomonNajib J. MajajJames J. DiCarlo

Abstract

The primate visual system achieves remarkable visual object recognition performance even in brief presentations, and under changes to object exemplar, geometric transformations, and background variation (a.k.a. core visual object recognition). This remarkable performance is mediated by the representation formed in inferior temporal (IT) cortex. In parallel, recent advances in machine learning have led to ever higher performing models of object recognition using artificial deep neural networks (DNNs). It remains unclear, however, whether the representational performance of DNNs rivals that of the brain. To accurately produce such a comparison, a major difficulty has been a unifying metric that accounts for experimental limitations, such as the amount of noise, the number of neural recording sites, and the number of trials, and computational limitations, such as the complexity of the decoding classifier and the number of classifier training examples. In this work, we perform a direct comparison that corrects for these experimental limitations and computational considerations. As part of our methodology, we propose an extension of "kernel analysis" that measures the generalization accuracy as a function of representational complexity. Our evaluations show that, unlike previous bio-inspired models, the latest DNNs rival the representational performance of IT cortex on this visual object recognition task. Furthermore, we show that models that perform well on measures of representational performance also perform well on measures of representational similarity to IT, and on measures of predicting individual IT multi-unit responses. Whether these DNNs rely on computational mechanisms similar to the primate visual system is yet to be determined, but, unlike all previous bio-inspired models, that possibility cannot be ruled out merely on representational performance grounds.

Neural dynamics and brain functionFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceVisual cortexCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)Visual ObjectsClassifier (UML)Machine learningArtificial neural networkRepresentation (politics)

MeSH terms

AlgorithmsAnimalsMacaca mulattaMaleModels, NeurologicalNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualTemporal LobeNeural Networks, Computer

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Eye Institute
Citations
909
FWCI
28.17
field-weighted impact
References
81
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Navigating the visual complexity: A deep dive into cifar-10 enhancement using resnet-50
International Journal of Electronic Devices and Networking · 2024 · 1 citations
Deep learning for visual understanding: A review
Neurocomputing · 2015 · 2,466 citations
Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex
Nature Neuroscience · 2016 · 1,720 citations
Deep learning
Nature · 2015 · 79,164 citations
Related articles
Visual Object Recognition
Annual Review of Neuroscience · 1996 · 1,321 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.