Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Replication as Strategy

Organization Science · 2001 · Vol. 12(6) · pp. 730–743
Sidney G. WinterGabriel Szulanski

Abstract

Replication, a familiar phenomenon sometimes referred to as the “McDonalds approach,” entails the creation and operation of a large number of similar outlets that deliver a product or perform a service. Companies pursuing this strategy are now active in over 60 industries. Although replicators are becoming one of the dominant organizational forms of our time, they have been neglected by scholars interested in organizations. As a result of this neglect, replication is typically conceptualized as little more than the exploitation of a simple business formula. Such a view clouds the strategic subtlety of replication by sidestepping the exploration efforts to uncover and develop the best business model as well as the ongoing assessment that precedes large-scale replication of it. Empirical evidence supports an alternative view of replication strategy as a process that involves a regime of exploration in which the business model is created and refined, followed by a phase of exploitation in which the business model is stabilized and leveraged through large-scale replication. In this paper we present the key elements of a theory of replication strategy. We discuss key aspects of a replication strategy, namely the broad scope of knowledge transfer and the role of the central organization, and the analytical concepts of template and Arrow core as a preamble for specifying hypotheses about the conditions under which a replication strategy is more likely to succeed in a competitive setting. Replication strategy provides unusually transparent examples of the process of leveraging knowledge assets; we exploit this in our concluding discussion.

Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and InnovationEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesReplication (statistics)Scope (computer science)Computer scienceKey (lock)Knowledge managementBusinessComputer security
Citations
1,305
FWCI
51.70
field-weighted impact
References
50
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
The dynamic resource‐based view: capability lifecycles
Strategic Management Journal · 2003 · 3,923 citations
Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities
Organization Science · 2002 · 6,709 citations
Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation
Journal of Management · 2016 · 1,720 citations
Dynamic capabilities: what are they?
Strategic Management Journal · 2000 · 14,245 citations
References
Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes
Management Science · 1997 · 2,235 citations
The myopia of learning
Strategic Management Journal · 1993 · 7,125 citations
Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy
Academy of Management Review · 2000 · 4,215 citations
Of strategies, deliberate and emergent
Strategic Management Journal · 1985 · 4,425 citations
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Administrative Science Quarterly · 1990 · 33,955 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.