Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers

Frontiers in Psychology · 2012 · Vol. 3 · pp. 429–429
Sanne DekkerNikki LeePaul Howard‐JonesJelle Jolles

Abstract

The OECD's Brain and Learning project (2002) emphasized that many misconceptions about the brain exist among professionals in the field of education. Though these so-called "neuromyths" are loosely based on scientific facts, they may have adverse effects on educational practice. The present study investigated the prevalence and predictors of neuromyths among teachers in selected regions in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. A large observational survey design was used to assess general knowledge of the brain and neuromyths. The sample comprised 242 primary and secondary school teachers who were interested in the neuroscience of learning. It would be of concern if neuromyths were found in this sample, as these teachers may want to use these incorrect interpretations of neuroscience findings in their teaching practice. Participants completed an online survey containing 32 statements about the brain and its influence on learning, of which 15 were neuromyths. Additional data was collected regarding background variables (e.g., age, sex, school type). Results showed that on average, teachers believed 49% of the neuromyths, particularly myths related to commercialized educational programs. Around 70% of the general knowledge statements were answered correctly. Teachers who read popular science magazines achieved higher scores on general knowledge questions. More general knowledge also predicted an increased belief in neuromyths. These findings suggest that teachers who are enthusiastic about the possible application of neuroscience findings in the classroom find it difficult to distinguish pseudoscience from scientific facts. Possessing greater general knowledge about the brain does not appear to protect teachers from believing in neuromyths. This demonstrates the need for enhanced interdisciplinary communication to reduce such misunderstandings in the future and establish a successful collaboration between neuroscience and education.

Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive FunctionPseudosciencePsychologySample (material)Observational studyGeneral knowledgeMathematics educationMedical educationDevelopmental psychologyAlternative medicineMedicine
Citations
591
FWCI
5.57
field-weighted impact
References
39
Percentile
97%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
The Seductive Allure of Neuroscience Explanations
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · 2007 · 1,049 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers · Scinovex