Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment*

The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2014 · Vol. 130(1) · pp. 165–218
Nicholas BloomJames LiangJohn RobertsZhichun Jenny Ying

Abstract

Abstract A rising share of employees now regularly engage in working from home (WFH), but there are concerns this can lead to “shirking from home.” We report the results of a WFH experiment at Ctrip, a 16,000-employee, NASDAQ-listed Chinese travel agency. Call center employees who volunteered to WFH were randomly assigned either to work from home or in the office for nine months. Home working led to a 13% performance increase, of which 9% was from working more minutes per shift (fewer breaks and sick days) and 4% from more calls per minute (attributed to a quieter and more convenient working environment). Home workers also reported improved work satisfaction, and their attrition rate halved, but their promotion rate conditional on performance fell. Due to the success of the experiment, Ctrip rolled out the option to WFH to the whole firm and allowed the experimental employees to reselect between the home and office. Interestingly, over half of them switched, which led to the gains from WFH almost doubling to 22%. This highlights the benefits of learning and selection effects when adopting modern management practices like WFH.

Work-Family Balance ChallengesTransportation Planning and OptimizationFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisAttritionPromotion (chess)Working hoursWork (physics)Agency (philosophy)BusinessPsychologyDemographic economicsOperations managementLabour economics

Funding

  • Economic and Social Research Council
Citations
1,854
FWCI
105.42
field-weighted impact
References
49
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
A study on hybrid work model: An approach to work-life balance in a changing environment
Asian Journal of Management and Commerce · 2025 · 0 citations
Gendered realities of remote work: Navigating work-life balance in the IT sector during the COVID-19 pandemic
International Journal of Research in Human Resource Management · 2025 · 0 citations
Remote work realities: Secondary analysis of employee productivity and well-being
International Journal of Applied Research · 2023 · 3 citations
References
Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency
American Economic Review · 1966 · 2,722 citations
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1988 · 31,622 citations
Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects
The Review of Economic Studies · 2009 · 1,349 citations
Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms and Countries
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2007 · 2,256 citations
Performance Pay and Productivity
American Economic Review · 2000 · 2,498 citations
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1988 · 31,606 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.