Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Antibody Targeting of Long-Circulating Lipidic Nanoparticles Does Not Increase Tumor Localization but Does Increase Internalization in Animal Models

Cancer Research · 2006 · Vol. 66(13) · pp. 6732–6740
Dmitri B. KirpotinDaryl C. DrummondYi ShaoM R ShalabyKeelung HongUlrik B. NielsenJames D. MarksChristopher C. BenzJohn W. Park

Abstract

We describe evidence for a novel mechanism of monoclonal antibody (MAb)-directed nanoparticle (immunoliposome) targeting to solid tumors in vivo. Long-circulating immunoliposomes targeted to HER2 (ErbB2, Neu) were prepared by the conjugation of anti-HER2 MAb fragments (Fab' or single chain Fv) to liposome-grafted polyethylene glycol chains. MAb fragment conjugation did not affect the biodistribution or long-circulating properties of i.v.-administered liposomes. However, antibody-directed targeting also did not increase the tumor localization of immunoliposomes, as both targeted and nontargeted liposomes achieved similarly high levels (7-8% injected dose/g tumor tissue) of tumor tissue accumulation in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer xenografts (BT-474). Studies using colloidal gold-labeled liposomes showed the accumulation of anti-HER2 immunoliposomes within cancer cells, whereas matched nontargeted liposomes were located predominantly in extracellular stroma or within macrophages. A similar pattern of stromal accumulation without cancer cell internalization was observed for anti-HER2 immunoliposomes in non-HER2-overexpressing breast cancer xenografts (MCF-7). Flow cytometry of disaggregated tumors posttreatment with either liposomes or immunoliposomes showed up to 6-fold greater intracellular uptake in cancer cells due to targeting. Thus, in contrast to nontargeted liposomes, anti-HER2 immunoliposomes achieved intracellular drug delivery via MAb-mediated endocytosis, and this, rather than increased uptake in tumor tissue, was correlated with superior antitumor activity. Immunoliposomes capable of selective internalization in cancer cells in vivo may provide new opportunities for drug delivery.

Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryInternalizationLiposomeEndocytosisDrug deliveryMonoclonal antibodyIn vivoCancer cellTargeted drug deliveryDrug carrierCancer

MeSH terms

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLiposomesTransplantation, HeterologousErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptor, ErbB-2NanostructuresMice
Citations
1,105
FWCI
31.41
field-weighted impact
References
37
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Impact of Nanotechnology on Drug Delivery
ACS Nano · 2009 · 3,261 citations
Active targeting schemes for nanoparticle systems in cancer therapeutics
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · 2008 · 1,702 citations
Targeted drug delivery to tumors: Myths, reality and possibility
Journal of Controlled Release · 2011 · 1,886 citations
A review of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug and gene delivery
Journal of Controlled Release · 2008 · 2,131 citations
Recent progress in tumor pH targeting nanotechnology
Journal of Controlled Release · 2008 · 840 citations
Advances and Challenges of Liposome Assisted Drug Delivery
Frontiers in Pharmacology · 2015 · 2,466 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.