Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions

American Journal of Botany · 2009 · Vol. 96(10) · pp. 1767–1778
Matthew C. NisbetDietram A. Scheufele

Abstract

In this essay, we review research from the social sciences on how the public makes sense of and participates in societal decisions about science and technology. We specifically highlight the role of the media and public communication in this process, challenging the still dominant assumption that science literacy is both the problem and the solution to societal conflicts. After reviewing the cases of evolution, climate change, food biotechnology, and nanotechnology, we offer a set of detailed recommendations for improved public engagement efforts on the part of scientists and their organizations. We emphasize the need for science communication initiatives that are guided by careful formative research; that span a diversity of media platforms and audiences; and that facilitate conversations with the public that recognize, respect, and incorporate differences in knowledge, values, perspectives, and goals.

Climate Change Communication and PerceptionMisinformation and Its ImpactsMedia Studies and CommunicationScience communicationScientific literacyDiversity (politics)Set (abstract data type)BiologyProcess (computing)Public engagementFormative assessmentLiteracyPublic awareness of science
Citations
1,011
FWCI
79.03
field-weighted impact
References
73
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach
American Journal of Sociology · 1989 · 4,864 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.