Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: a general perspective

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2011 · Vol. 13(44) · pp. 19663–19663
Carlos VegaJ. L. F. Abascal

Abstract

Over the last forty years many computer simulations of water have been performed using rigid non-polarizable models. Since these models describe water interactions in an approximate way it is evident that they cannot reproduce all of the properties of water. By now many properties for these kinds of models have been determined and it seems useful to compile some of these results and provide a critical view of the successes and failures. In this paper a test is proposed in which 17 properties of water, from the vapour and liquid to the solid phases, are taken into account to evaluate the performance of a water model. A certain number of points between zero (bad agreement) and ten (good agreement) are given for the predictions of each model and property. We applied the test to five rigid non-polarizable models, TIP3P, TIP5P, TIP4P, SPC/E and TIP4P/2005, obtaining an average score of 2.7, 3.7, 4.7, 5.1, and 7.2 respectively. Thus although no model reproduces all properties, some models perform better than others. It is clear that there are limitations for rigid non-polarizable models. Neglecting polarizability prevents an accurate description of virial coefficients, vapour pressures, critical pressure and dielectric constant. Neglecting nuclear quantum effects prevents an accurate description of the structure, the properties of water below 120 K and the heat capacity. It is likely that for rigid non-polarizable models it may not be possible to increase the score in the test proposed here beyond 7.6. To get closer to experiment, incorporating polarization and nuclear quantum effects is absolutely required even though a substantial increase in computer time should be expected. The test proposed here, being quantitative and selecting properties from all phases of water can be useful in the future to identify progress in the modelling of water.

Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsPolarizabilityWater modelDielectricQuantumStatistical physicsThermodynamicsVirial coefficientChemistryPhysicsComputational chemistry
Citations
973
FWCI
34.11
field-weighted impact
References
356
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Building Water Models: A Different Approach
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · 2014 · 1,318 citations
References
The structure and properties of water
Journal of Molecular Structure · 1970 · 2,938 citations
The nature of the chemical bond—1992
Journal of Chemical Education · 1992 · 13,126 citations
Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water
The Journal of Chemical Physics · 1983 · 41,376 citations
Self-diffusion in normal and heavy water in the range 1-45.deg.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry · 1973 · 1,686 citations
A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: TIP4P/2005
The Journal of Chemical Physics · 2005 · 3,883 citations
Van der Waals Density Functional for General Geometries
Physical Review Letters · 2004 · 5,523 citations
All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 1998 · 14,418 citations
Related articles
A molecular dynamics study of polarizable water
Molecular Physics · 1989 · 410 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: a general perspective · Scinovex