Scinovex
letter Open AccessTop 1% cited

A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems

Ecology Letters · 2013 · Vol. 16(5) · pp. 584–599
Christina M. KennedyEric V. LonsdorfMaile C. NeelNeal M. WilliamsTaylor H. RickettsRachael WinfreeRiccardo BommarcoClaire BrittainAlana L. BurleyDaniel P. CariveauLuísa G. CarvalheiroNatacha P. ChacoffSaul A. CunninghamBryan N. DanforthJan‐Hendrik DudenhöfferElizabeth ElleHannah R. GainesLucas A. GaribaldiClaudio GrattonAndrea HolzschuhRufus IsaacsSteven K. JavorekShalene JhaAlexandra‐Maria KleinKristin M. KrewenkaYael MandelikMargaret M. MayfieldLora A. MorandinLisa A. NeameMark OtienoMia ParkSimon G. PottsMaj RundlöfAgustín SáezIngolf Steffan‐DewenterHisatomo TakiBlandina Felipe VianaCatrin WestphalJulianna K. WilsonSarah S. GreenleafClaire Kremen

Abstract

Bees provide essential pollination services that are potentially affected both by local farm management and the surrounding landscape. To better understand these different factors, we modelled the relative effects of landscape composition (nesting and floral resources within foraging distances), landscape configuration (patch shape, interpatch connectivity and habitat aggregation) and farm management (organic vs. conventional and local-scale field diversity), and their interactions, on wild bee abundance and richness for 39 crop systems globally. Bee abundance and richness were higher in diversified and organic fields and in landscapes comprising more high-quality habitats; bee richness on conventional fields with low diversity benefited most from high-quality surrounding land cover. Landscape configuration effects were weak. Bee responses varied slightly by biome. Our synthesis reveals that pollinator persistence will depend on both the maintenance of high-quality habitats around farms and on local management practices that may offset impacts of intensive monoculture agriculture.

Plant and animal studiesInsect and Pesticide ResearchInsect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorSpecies richnessPollinatorEcologyHabitatForagingPollinationAgroecosystemAbundance (ecology)GeographyAgroforestry

MeSH terms

AgricultureAnimalsBeesClimateModels, TheoreticalPopulation DensityEcosystemCrops, AgriculturalFlowersPollination

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • World Wildlife Fund
  • Harvard University
  • New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station
  • Nature Conservancy
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Citations
1,202
FWCI
159.25
field-weighted impact
References
48
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach
Journal of Wildlife Management · 2003 · 42,134 citations
Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2006 · 6,949 citations
Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2007 · 1,815 citations
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
Trends in Ecology & Evolution · 2010 · 6,184 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.