Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers.

American Journal of Public Health · 1987 · Vol. 77(11) · pp. 1435–1438

Abstract

Questionnaire and biochemical measures of smoking were studied in 211 hospital outpatients. Eleven different tests of smoke intake were compared for their ability to categorize smokers and nonsmokers correctly. The concentration of cotinine, whether measured in plasma, saliva, or urine, was the best indicator of smoking, with sensitivity of 96-97 per cent and specificity of 99-100 per cent. Thiocyanate provided the poorest discrimination. Carbon monoxide measured as blood carboxyhaemoglobin or in expired air gave sensitivity and specificity of about 90 per cent. Sensitivities of the tests were little affected by the presence among the claimed nonsmokers of a group of 21 "deceivers" who concealed their smoking. It is concluded that cotinine is the measure of choice, but for most clinical applications carbon monoxide provides an acceptable degree of discrimination and is considerably cheaper and simpler to apply.

Smoking Behavior and CessationNoise Effects and ManagementChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCotinineMedicineCarboxyhemoglobinExpired airUrineSalivaThiocyanateNicotineSmokePhysiology

MeSH terms

Carbon MonoxideChromatography, GasCotinineEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNicotinePyrrolidinonesSurveys and QuestionnairesSalivaSmokingThiocyanates
Citations
1,013
FWCI
9.85
field-weighted impact
References
21
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · 2002 · 521 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. · Scinovex