Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

POLLEN LIMITATION OF PLANT REPRODUCTION: ECOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES

Ecology · 2004 · Vol. 85(9) · pp. 2408–2421
Tia‐Lynn AshmanTiffany M. KnightJanette A. SteetsPriyanga AmarasekareMartin BurdDiane R. CampbellMichele R. DudashMark O. JohnstonSusan J. MazerRandall J. MitchellMartin MorganWilliam G. Wilson

Abstract

Determining whether seed production is pollen limited has been an area of intensive empirical study over the last two decades. Yet current evidence does not allow satisfactory assessment of the causes or consequences of pollen limitation. Here, we critically evaluate existing theory and issues concerning pollen limitation. Our main conclusion is that a change in approach is needed to determine whether pollen limitation reflects random fluctuations around a pollen–resource equilibrium, an adaptation to stochastic pollination environments, or a chronic syndrome caused by an environmental perturbation. We formalize and extend D. Haig and M. Westoby's conceptual model, and illustrate its use in guiding research on the evolutionary consequences of pollen limitation, i.e., whether plants evolve or have evolved to ameliorate pollen limitation. This synthesis also reveals that we are only beginning to understand when and how pollen limitation at the plant level translates into effects on plant population dynamics. We highlight the need for both theoretical and empirical approaches to gain a deeper understanding of the importance of life-history characters, Allee effects, and environmental perturbations in population declines mediated by pollen limitation. Lastly, our synthesis identifies a critical need for research on potential effects of pollen limitation at the community and ecosystem levels.

Plant and animal studiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesPollenPollinationEcologyPopulationBiologyPlant reproductionEcosystemEvolutionary ecologyAdaptation (eye)Reproduction

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • University of California, Santa Barbara
  • National Center For Environmental Assessment
Citations
1,363
FWCI
69.26
field-weighted impact
References
78
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.