article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Comparison of continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2005 · Vol. 20(8) · pp. 1630–1637

Dominik E. Uehlinger✉(University of Bern)Stephan M. Jakob(University of Bern)Paolo Ferrari(Hypertension Institute)Markus Eichelberger(Hypertension Institute)Uyen Huynh‐Do(Hypertension Institute)Hanspeter Marti(Hypertension Institute)Markus G. Mohaupt(Hypertension Institute)Bruno Vogt(Hypertension Institute)Hans Ulrich Rothen(University of Bern)B. Regli(University of Bern)Jukka Takala(University of Bern)Felix J. Frey(Hypertension Institute)

View via DOI Full-text PDF

Abstract

The present investigation provides no evidence for a survival benefit of continuous vs intermittent RRT in ICU patients with ARF.

Acute Kidney Injury Research Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationMedicineRenal replacement therapyCritically illIntensive care medicineAcute kidney injuryIntensive careHemodialysisInternal medicine

MeSH terms

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleRenal DialysisHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexUremiaVasoconstrictor AgentsTreatment OutcomeHemodiafiltration

Citations

340

FWCI

14.37

field-weighted impact

References

Percentile

99%

vs. same field & year

Citations per year

Cited by

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016