Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system

BMC Health Services Research · 2005 · Vol. 5(1) · pp. 25–25
David C. AtkinsPeter A. BrissMartin EcclesSigne FlottorpGordon GuyattRobin HarbourSuzanne HillRoman JaeschkeAlessandro LiberatiNicola MagriniJames MasonDianne O’ConnellAndrew D OxmanBob PhillipsHolger J. SchünemannTessa Tan-Torres EdejerGunn Elisabeth VistJohn W WilliamsThe GRADE Working Group

Abstract

Judgements about evidence and recommendations are complex. Some subjectivity, especially regarding recommendations, is unavoidable. We believe our system for guiding these complex judgements appropriately balances the need for simplicity with the need for full and transparent consideration of all important issues.

Clinical practice guidelines implementationMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMedicineHealth informaticsNursing researchHealth administrationGrading (engineering)Public healthNursingEngineering

MeSH terms

HumansJudgmentPilot ProjectsQuality Assurance, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicRisk AssessmentEvidence-Based MedicineComprehensionConsensus
Citations
326
FWCI
19.84
field-weighted impact
References
14
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system · Scinovex