article Open AccessTop 1% cited
Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment
Cognition · 2008 · Vol. 107(3) · pp. 1144–1154
Joshua D. Greene✉(Harvard University Press)Sylvia A. Morelli(UCLA Health)Kelly LowenbergLeigh E. Nystrom(Princeton University)Jonathan D. Cohen(Princeton University)
Psychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorPsychologyCognitionDual process theory (moral psychology)Social cognitive theory of moralityMoral disengagementMoral developmentDual (grammatical number)Moral psychologyMoral reasoningProcess (computing)
MeSH terms
AdultCognitionFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleMoralsReaction Time
Citations
1,221
FWCI
16.20
field-weighted impact
References
53
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2009 · 4,509 citations
References
A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.
American Psychologist · 2003 · 5,435 citations
A cognitive developmental approach to morality: investigating the psychopath
Cognition · 1995 · 1,524 citations
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Psychological Review · 2001 · 7,784 citations
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 1989 · 5,372 citations
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
Neuron · 2004 · 2,612 citations
The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment
Psychological Science · 2006 · 997 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.