Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition

Sensors · 2014 · Vol. 14(4) · pp. 6474–6499
Oresti BañosJuan Manuel GálvezMiguel DamasH. PomaresIgnacio Rojas

Abstract

Signal segmentation is a crucial stage in the activity recognition process; however, this has been rarely and vaguely characterized so far. Windowing approaches are normally used for segmentation, but no clear consensus exists on which window size should be preferably employed. In fact, most designs normally rely on figures used in previous works, but with no strict studies that support them. Intuitively, decreasing the window size allows for a faster activity detection, as well as reduced resources and energy needs. On the contrary, large data windows are normally considered for the recognition of complex activities. In this work, we present an extensive study to fairly characterize the windowing procedure, to determine its impact within the activity recognition process and to help clarify some of the habitual assumptions made during the recognition system design. To that end, some of the most widely used activity recognition procedures are evaluated for a wide range of window sizes and activities. From the evaluation, the interval 1-2 s proves to provide the best trade-off between recognition speed and accuracy. The study, specifically intended for on-body activity recognition systems, further provides designers with a set of guidelines devised to facilitate the system definition and configuration according to the particular application requirements and target activities.

Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringComputer scienceActivity recognitionWindow (computing)SegmentationProcess (computing)Set (abstract data type)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceInterval (graph theory)Data mining

MeSH terms

HumansHuman ActivitiesPattern Recognition, AutomatedPhysical FitnessExercise
Citations
619
FWCI
19.27
field-weighted impact
References
90
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Nearest neighbor pattern classification
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 1967 · 15,642 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.