Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses

International Journal of Epidemiology · 2008 · Vol. 38(1) · pp. 287–298
Jesper BrokKristian ThorlundJørn WetterslevChristian Gluud

Abstract

Many apparently conclusive Cochrane neonatal meta-analyses may become inconclusive when the statistical analyses take into account the risk of random error due to repetitive testing.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysisRandom effects modelStudy heterogeneityMedicineStatisticStatisticsRelative riskRandomized controlled trialSample size determinationConfidence interval

MeSH terms

Data Interpretation, StatisticalHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Newborn, DiseasesReview Literature as TopicMeta-Analysis as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample Size
Citations
946
FWCI
17.48
field-weighted impact
References
76
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.